Shortly after the initial furor died down over Pat Robertson's confident pronouncements about the causes of Haiti's misfortune, Ann pointed me to an insightful article. In it, the author pinpointed some of the underlying assumptions implicit in Robertson's thinking which seem to still have traction among American Christianity. These assumptions go the heart of our cultural heresies about faith and "blessing."
What Robertson presumes is that misfortune constitutes divine rejection. Somehow or another, the fact that Haiti has suffered poverty and calamity is evidence to him of their lack of favor with God. While there is evidence God dealt with Israel this way under the Old Covenant, it is hard to project that belief into New Testament theology. If this line of thinking is accurate, surely Jesus was cursed for hanging on a tree. Paul must have been a terrible liar to suffer such misfortune at God hands. In fact, pretty much every apostle was apparently a disobedient soul. Only John managed to escape violent death.
If this line of thinking were only found in televangelists who are easily lampooned, it would be one thing. But the largest church in America is pastored by a man with similar beliefs. In fact, American 'Christians' seem particularly drawn to this way of thinking about the life of faith. Particularly haunting is the realization of Francis Chan, who concluded that if he and Jesus had a church in the same town, his congregation would be larger. That's not a good thing.
Perhaps there is the soft underbelly of my own way of looking at this. Like many preachers, I tend to associate success in church with growth and numbers. And while we don't need to be doing things poorly just to keep people from coming; perhaps having happy, affluent members coming by the droves to houses of worship isn't necessarily always a good thing?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
I'm not sure its fair to say either it is or it isn't. God can do what he wants.
God did present the Israelites with major consequences but he also allowed calamity to come upon Job. In both situations to demonstrate His glory, among other things.
I know there are certain things we as believers need to have a black and white answer for but I'm not sure knowing why God is doing what He's doing is one of them.
I don't know Robertson myself, but I do know me. I'd be in a mess if I believed God showed His wrath on me when He wasn't pleased. Either right now I'd be neck deep in pride (and denial) because of how easy and good my life is, or I'd be living in fear because I know the sinfulness inside of me.
My guess is, although I can't be sure, God isn't particularly pleased with America.
I have always struggled with the idea that numbers makes or breaks what God is doing.
Matthew 18:20 says "Where there are two or three gathered in my name, I will be among them."
I also believe that you can put any set of numbers in that passage, and as long as we are gathered in his name and for his Glory, He is there.
What matters is how we teach whatever number of people God has entrusted to our shepherding.
I am confident there are any number of reasons for what God does. The beauty of that is that I don't have to know. I trust in his character and am grateful for the mercy and grace he shows me daily. To say that bad things happen because the people in question have committed some horrific thing is dangerous. God rebuked Job's friends for those very things. He didn't even give credence to Elihu before speaking to Job.
Post a Comment